Contents:
They rebuilt old Victorian homes that lined the streets and opened popular restaurants and shops. By the mid-to-late s, the Castro had become an attractive place to live for queer and straight people alike. I feel like, as it becomes more of a global tourist destination and less of a community, it loses some of its heart and some of its soul.
Myles Downes is one of those people. We can go and live in the middle of a predominantly straight community, and people are pretty cool with it and it's no big deal.
But other places in the Bay Area with growing queer communities are trying to be a little more purposeful. Sonoma and Alameda counties have the highest proportion of same-sex couples in the Bay Area and in the state, along with Riverside and Santa Cruz after San Francisco, according to the American Community Survey. They opened the restaurant at the beginning of the year without any political agenda.
The city hosts an annual transgender conference, and Brew hosted a party for a group of transgender kids in October. Cordelia Southworth, a trans woman, has been living in Santa Rosa for more than 20 years.
She has been looking to move to San Francisco recently to be a part of a more active queer community. It might liven up around here.

Search-Icon Created with Sketch. KQED is a proud member of.
Always free. KQED Inform.
Is the Castro Getting Less Gay? Bay Curious. Listen 10 min.
Ryan Levi. Dec 6, California law prohibits anyone over the age of 18 to have sexual intercourse with anyone under the age of A provision law states that in cases where a sexual partner is over the age of 15 and their partner is within 10 years of their age, the partner over the age of 18 will not automatically be placed on the registry. Depending on the circumstances, a California judge can manually list Romeo as a sex offender on the registry. However, if Romeo and Juliet engage in any consensual oral or anal sex, the provision is no longer applicable.
LGBT young adults are often listed as sex offenders when engaging in consensual sexual relationships. These individuals would be protected under the provision, that is if the partners were not homosexual. Justice is not blind. The law should not treat a high school relationship differently due to sexual orientation or gender identity.
It is time we update these laws and treat everyone equally. Under the bill, individuals engaged in sexual relations with minors age 14 years or younger would NOT be protected.